AMERICAN ANGUS ASSOCIATION - THE BUSINESS BREED

Embracing Unconventional Ideas for Profit

Getting creative with income generation and herd supplementation featured on episode of ‘Angus at Work.’

By Lynsey McAnally, Angus Beef Bulletin Associate Editor

December 3, 2024

stockyard

Though cattle prices are still strong, the struggles cattlemen are facing can be overwhelming. Whether you’re facing the effects of drought, market volatility, inflation or high input costs, these uncertain times can also lead to an abundance of opportunity for those willing and able to get a little creative from a management perspective. To take a deeper look into this idea, our team visited with Karla Wilke, associate professor of range management and cow-calf specialist with the University of Nebraska, regarding options for income generation and enterprises.

Yearlings offer diversification option

Growing up on a stocker and farming operation in the Texas Panhandle, Wilke’s background drives her to continue to find pathways for producers to build security by diversifying their operations. One option involves comparing the investment and commitment of growing yearlings vs. managing a mature cow herd. Even if a producer retains calves from weaning until they’re sold to a feedlot, they’re still marketing that animal before it reaches 2 years of age. Cows, on the other hand, are a long-term commitment and require a larger forage investment.

“Let’s say [yearlings] average 850 pounds (lb.), then that is going to use about 0.8 animal unit months’ (AUMs) worth of grazing. A cow-calf pair that weighs 1,700 pounds is going to be 1.7,” notes Wilke. “So, essentially, two yearlings can graze for every cow-calf pair.”

What that means from a management perspective is that if cattlemen find themselves in a drought situation and need to liquidate animals, they can sell two yearlings and not lose much other than a couple months of additional grazing. If a producer needs to sell a cow-calf pair, they’ve lost a much larger investment.

The depreciation of mature females within each cow herd isn’t a cost that producers necessarily write a check for, but it’s still a very real cost within each operation, says Wilke.

“Cow depreciation, in the simplest terms, is the cost to purchase or develop that female minus whatever salvage value you got out of her divided by the number of calves that she produced for you. If you paid $2,000 for her, then sold her for $800 and she’s had something like three calves, then her depreciation was $400,” explains Wilke, noting that losing that much money on a female is a significant loss for most operations. “If you have to liquidate [that female] because of drought, that becomes a very costly move that sometimes we have to make.”

Winter supplementation

Evaluating forage resources available, as well as the unique challenges of pasture location or composition, is an important box to check when making management decisions.

“You have some annual forages. You have a place over here that’s hard to get to that you don’t want to calve at. That might be a good place for [stockers],” suggests Wilke. “We talked about forage resources, labor resources, facilities, equipment and marketing options. All the things you need to think through from start to finish before you decide whether you really are set up to do this or could get set up to do this.”

Another important consideration for producers is the genetic foundation of their herd. Opportunities could exist to develop heifers for another operation if your own herd is focused on females. In contrast, if your operation exists to produce the best terminal cross, maybe targeting development of feedlot-entry-type animals would be a better fit.

While many producers have the mindset they’re not going to feed yearlings much through the winter so they experience compensatory gain once those cattle are provided a higher-quality forage, there’s something to be said for consistency, says Wilke.

“The research that I shared indicated that if we feed those calves to gain 1 to 1.5 pounds a day during the winter instead of 0.5 to 1 pound, between that range, that they will end up with some gain that they maintain. The calves that are trying to compensate will not actually catch up completely to those calves that were supplemented at a higher range,” explains Wilke. “When we finish [those calves] out, or when we sell them at the end of the summer, they’ll still be the heavier calves.”

Wilke further noted that some additional data showed if cattle are just barely supplemented enough to keep them going, cattlemen totally waste their money. Essentially, she says, if the non-supplemented calf and the barely supplemented calf come out the same weight, producers spent money that returned nothing.

Editor’s note: The information above is summarized from the Oct. 12, 2022, episode of  Angus at Work, a podcast hosted by the  Angus Beef Bulletin team. To listen to the full discussion,  including further information on income generation and supplementation options, check out our Angus at Work  archive.

Angus Beef Bulletin EXTRA, Vol. 16, No. 12-A

January 2025 cover

Current Angus Beef Bulletin

Articles to help you make the most of your investment in Angus genetics.

Angus At Work Color Logo

Angus at Work

A podcast for the profit-minded commercial cattleman.